so Dany Bober's view on humour is that there shouldn't be any religionwithout humour as well as no humour without religion.
I get it
"......Be what it is, The Action of my life is like it, which I'll keep if but for sympathy."
I get it
the way of the holy
holy as contrasted with the sacrosanct by Levinas
questions might be asked and addressed as they should be
like in a mirror but true sided
avoiding all the background noise to be almost brutally confronted
rough and glorious love
how to tell somebody that both assumptions are compatible when they make them out to be in a deadly combat
So the priest put forward the dilemma: There are two people in danger of losing their life but you can only save one of them. Furthermore you know for sure that one of them is an utterly good person and the other is an utterly bad one. Whom will you save? I responded that it depended on the strength of my faith. If my faith was really strong in that particular moment I'd certainly save the bad one.
So be warned.
Adolf Wohlbrück aka Anton Walbrook thought it odd to act in the outdoors, the landscape, obviously he preferred artificial settings.